The first and only treatment to show superior efficacy vs standard single-agent chemotherapy in FRα-positive* PROC1-3

*FRα positive is defined as ≥75% of viable tumor cells with moderate (2+) and/or strong (3+) membrane staining based on an IHC assay.4

MIRASOL: The first, only, and largest positive phase 3 study specifically for patients with FRα-positive PROC VS STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY1-3,5*

MIRASOL was a confirmatory, global, multicenter, randomized, open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ELAHERE vs investigator's choice chemotherapy in FRα-positive, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer1,2†

MIRASOL Study Criteria

*Versus single-agent chemotherapy.

†Includes epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.1

‡Paclitaxel was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle (80 mg/m2 of BSA); PLD was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 4-week cycle (40 mg/m2); and topotecan was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle (4 mg/m2) or was administered intravenously on days 1 to 5 of a 3-week cycle (1.25 mg/m2).2

§Since the primary endpoint was statistically significant, a hierarchical testing procedure was used to control the study-wise error rate for key secondary endpoints of ORR and OS, in that order.2

Due to there being no procedure in place to control the type I error on other secondary efficacy endpoints, all P values for treatment comparison on other secondary efficacy endpoints will be for information only and will be considered as nominal.2,6

Key eligibility criteria for MIRASOL

  • Patients received 1 to 3 lines of prior systemic therapy; prior bevacizumab and PARPi therapy were allowed2
  • Patients with BRCA mutations were allowed in the study2
  • Patients with primary platinum-refractory disease, defined as PFI of <3 months, were excluded2,7
  • Patients were excluded if they had corneal disorders, ocular conditions requiring ongoing treatment, Grade >1 peripheral neuropathy, or noninfectious interstitial lung disease1

453 PARTICIPANTS REPRESENTING A RANGE OF DEMOGRAPHICS1,2

Characteristics2

Elahere,n (%)(n=227)

Standard chemotherapy,n (%)(n=226)

Median age (range)

Age in years

64 (32-88)

62 (29-87)

Stage at initial diagnosis

I-II

9 (4)

9 (4)

III

137 (60)

147 (65)

IV

76 (34)

65 (29)

BRCA mutation

Yes

33 (15)

36 (16)

No or unknown

198 (87)

190 (84)

Prior exposure

Bevacizumab

138 (61)

143 (63)

PARPi

124 (55)

127 (56)

Taxanes

227 (100)

224 (99)

Primary platinum-free interval

≤12 months

146 (64)

142 (63)

>12 months

80 (35)

84 (37)

Platinum-free interval

≤3 months

88 (39)

99 (44)

>3 to ≤6 months

138 (61)

124 (55)

Number of prior systematic therapies

1

29 (13)

34 (15)

2

90 (40)

88 (39)

3

108 (48)

104 (46)

ECOG PS

0

130 (57)

120 (53)

1

97 (43)

101 (45)

2

0

3 (1)

Missing data

0

2 (1)

Race

White

156 (69)

145 (64)

Black

8 (4)

5 (2)

Asian

28 (12)

25 (11)

Not reported

32 (14)

49 (22)

other

3 (1)

2 (1)

Ethnicity

Hispanic or Latino

12 (5)

15 (7)

Not Hispanic or Latino

177 (78)

163 (72)

Unknown

2 (1)

2 (1)

Not reported

35 (15)

45 (20)

Missing data

1 (<1)

1 (<1)

In the overall MIRASOL patient population, 14% of patients had received 1 prior line of systemic therapy, 39% had received 2 prior lines, and 47% had received 3 prior lines. Additionally, 37% of patients had received prior systemic therapy for platinum-resistant disease, 62% had received prior bevacizumab, and 55% had received a prior PARPi.1

ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.